LACMA

ShopMembershipMyLACMATickets
LACMA
Los Angeles County Museum of Art
5905 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90036
info@lacma.org
(323) 857-6000
Sign up to receive emails
Subscribe
© Museum Associates 2025

Museum Hours

Monday

11 am–6 pm

Tuesday

11 am–6 pm

Wednesday

Closed

Thursday

11 am–6 pm

Friday

11 am–8 pm

Saturday

10 am–7 pm

Sunday

10 am–7 pm

 

  • About LACMA
  • Jobs
  • Building LACMA
  • Host An Event
  • Unframed
  • Press
  • FAQs
  • Log in to MyLACMA
  • Privacy Policy
© Museum Associates 2025
Collections

Lorser Feitelson
Marriage of Two Lines1970

Not on view
No image
Artist or Maker
Lorser Feitelson
United States, 1898-1978
Title
Marriage of Two Lines
Date Made
1970
Medium
Acrylic on canvas
Dimensions
60 × 55 × 2 1/4 in. (152.4 × 139.7 × 5.72 cm)
Credit Line
Gift of Gene Gill
Accession Number
M.2019.145.1
Classification
Paintings
Collecting Area
Modern Art
Curatorial Notes

Lorser Feitelson was one of the leaders in the 1950s and 60s of what, in a Southern California context, is called Abstract Classicism, known elsewhere more generically as hard-edge abstraction. (By this time he had moved on from his previous interest in figurative Post-Surrealism.) Born in Georgia and raised in New York City, Feitelson moved to California in 1927 after significant travels in Europe, and spent the rest of his career based in Los Angeles.


Early in 1963, Feitelson became interested in lines for themselves, rather than as descriptions of forms, and from that point on, his canvases featured curved lines almost exclusively, as he experimented with color contrasts, negative space, and perceptual kinetics. The calligraphic compositions of paintings such as Marriage of Two Lines have been described as mirrored, doubled, dancing, even flirtatious; scholar Paul Karlstrom called them “pure gesture that engages the viewer with the intimacy of an embrace.” But the artist—though he acknowledged some of the figural references in these compositions—focused on the reductive rather than the associative nature of the images, maintaining that a painting “has to rest on one statement alone or it has nothing.”